FW:FW:FW:FW:the happiness of my partner.

2003-03-22 Thread maymarquez
Title: Hello Hello, k66nvb4 k66nvbj We are your # 1 MALE ORGAN ENLARGEMENT  k66nvbx k66nvb3 supplement on the web. We guarantee the success of our program or we will refund every  k66nvbt k66nvb7 penny. Come find out why more men come to us than

Re: first batch of restructuring in the policy manual

2003-03-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:08:21 +0100, >> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On that note, by proofreading the debian/rules sections I > determined that the last restructuring caused bug #88029. Not that > there was anything wrong with the method used[1], it merely made me > lament the f

Re: first batch of restructuring in the policy manual

2003-03-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:13:05PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Were there any normative changes made whan this restructuring was done? A few non-controversial things, I think. I added all the fields (like Closes, Changed-By and possibly others) to the Policy and described those that weren't

Re: first batch of restructuring in the policy manual

2003-03-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:30:08 +0100, >> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi, I've finished moving things around. See it at: > http://www.srce.hr/~joy/policy/ > I've replaced many packaging manual sections that were integrated > into policy sections with links to the latter.

Bug#169600: Policy should mandate a place for init.d script to log errors to

2003-03-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:48:55 +0100, >> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > However, even if it's common sense, it might be necessary to > introduce also a convention regarding error checking and > logging. Don't we already have /var/log as a recommended place

first batch of restructuring in the policy manual

2003-03-22 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I've finished moving things around. See it at: http://www.srce.hr/~joy/policy/ I've replaced many packaging manual sections that were integrated into policy sections with links to the latter. I've aimed to eliminate needlessly deep section levels, and for example split out the binar

Bug#177523: Bug#185364: debian-policy: project url's should be required for each apt-cache package description

2003-03-22 Thread Adam DiCarlo
reopen 177523 reassign 177523 developers-reference thanks Regarding bug 177523, I agree there may be some merit to this recommendation but I am not totally clear. what are the situations where trailing whitespace is problematic? Regarding trailing whitespace in syslog, isn't that an issue which

Bug#185364: debian-policy: project url's should be required for each apt-cache package description

2003-03-22 Thread Adam DiCarlo
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear developers reference, I was told these might be useful. > Bug#185364 Bug#177523 Regarding bug 185364, I already do recommend that the "Homepage" be added to the package description. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.debian.org/>

Processed: Re: Bug#185364: debian-policy: project url's should be required for each apt-cache package description

2003-03-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 177523 Bug#177523: debian-policy: mom says: no wasteful trailing whitespace in logfiles, etc. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 177523 developers-reference Bug#177523: debian-policy: mom says: no wasteful trailing whitespace in