Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-01-26 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Em Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:16:19 -0600 (CST), Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > escreveu: > > > > Thanks for creating this pseudo module, or for indicating who I should ask > > > if I'm wrong. > > > > Ask ftpmaster, they are responsible. Additionall

Re: OSD && DFSG convergence

2003-01-26 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:33:58PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:55:05PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > > > We want to explore convergence between the Open Source Definition, and > > the Debian Free Software Guidelines. OSI is interested in mending > > differenc

Re: OSD && DFSG convergence

2003-01-26 Thread Adam DiCarlo
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:55:05PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > Hi. I'm the vice-president of the Open Source Initiative, and I'm > > writing to you today in that stead. > > > We want to explore convergence between the Open Source Definition, and

Re: OSD && DFSG convergence

2003-01-26 Thread Steve Langasek
[CC:ed to debian-policy, which seems a more likely forum for discussing changes to core documents.] Hi Russ, On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:55:05PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > Hi. I'm the vice-president of the Open Source Initiative, and I'm > writing to you today in that stead. > We want to exp

Bug#87510: how build dependencies are specified in policy

2003-01-26 Thread Santiago Vila
+ When binary packages are on the so-called build-essential + list, the build-dependencies can be omitted. Please see + for more information. A package is build-essential when it's build-essential according to the definition of build-essential. Any list, if exist, is on

Bug#178455: www.debian.org: Spelling errors in debconf specification (doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html)

2003-01-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:28:02AM -0500, Jay Bonci wrote: > Please let me know if this isn't the case. It's from debian-policy, but never mind. > There are three minor spelling errors I noticed in the package while reading > it for my NM application: > > supplimented => supplemented > questons

CVS joy: fixed typos noticed by Jay Bonci, closes: #178455

2003-01-26 Thread Debian Policy CVS
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: joy Sun Jan 26 05:51:27 MST 2003 Modified files: debconf_spec : debconf_specification.xml debconf_spec/include: commands.xml Log message: fixed typos noticed by Jay Bonci, closes: #178455

CVS joy: sync

2003-01-26 Thread Debian Policy CVS
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: joy Sun Jan 26 05:52:15 MST 2003 Modified files: debian : changelog Log message: sync

Processed: debconf spec is in debian-policy

2003-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 178455 debian-policy Bug#178455: www.debian.org: Spelling errors in debconf specification (doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html) Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `debian-policy'. > -- Stopping processing here. Plea