> (BTW does anyone know offhand of a good reference for what's supposed
> to happen when you end up with conflicting shared-lib sub-depends?
> I.e. libfoo -> libbar -> libbaz1
> -> libbax -> libbaz2
> so that libfoo is indirectly linked against two versions of libbaz?
> I've recei
> >- It would in theory let software like doc-base dynamically generate
> > the documentation formats the user desires after installation.
>
> The more I think about this idea of building on install, though, the
> more I think it's completely insane. At least until the XML/SGML
> builders out
The policy text needs to have sensible-www-browser replaced with
"sensible-browser", which is the real name of the program in
debianutils.
--
see shy jo
pgpjGcd8WlILV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> > Yes, but that means extraction of possibly huge data.tar.gz, versus
> > extracting a much tinier control.tar.gz.
>
> I can't tell it for sure, but a c program that only extracting such a file
> should not be so slo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:07:34AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:27:48AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > that program may be configured to use /usr/bin/sensible-www-browser
> >
> > Inconsistency that should probably be fixed before going into Policy.
>
> How is this inc
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:27:48AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > that program may be configured to use /usr/bin/sensible-www-browser
>
> Inconsistency that should probably be fixed before going into Policy.
How is this inconsistent?
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:48:33AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> URI schemes are not to be used as a means of expressing the purpose of
> the URI.
I was refering to wikiwiki like system i sow someware.
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 18:58, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> The consensus we arrived at on debian-doc list (with the exception of
> Colin Walters) was that XML/SGML source is in fact source and
> shouldn't be there bloating binary pkgs.
FYI, I wasn't really against the consensus; just pointing out somethi
8 matches
Mail list logo