Bug#160827: syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field

2002-12-07 Thread Clint Adams
> True. It could get away with tossing everything outside angulars or > inside brackets, though. The address can be mandated to stay 7bit for > now. At any rate, people shouldn't be putting raw Latin1 in these fields.

Bug#160827: syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field

2002-12-07 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Preserving would be useful if there were a lot of users or programs > > taking the content of the maintainer field and stuffing it into a To > > header.[...] > > One program that does that is jennifer (of katie fame). True. It could get away with tossi

Bug#160827: syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field

2002-12-07 Thread Clint Adams
> Preserving would be useful if there were a lot of users or programs > taking the content of the maintainer field and stuffing it into a To > header. I know of no programs doing that and regarding users, I think > we'd rather deprecate the practice in favor of {packages,bugs}.d.o. One program tha

subscribe

2002-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Fottner