On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:51:46AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> I don't know the point of "must" and "should", since it is
> the release manager who decides which bug is RC.
It's to prevent severity inflation. It is presumably a bad thing for
non-catastrophic violations of policy to result in bug
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:39:22PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:29:09PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > I think the best choice is to increase the value to 30 or 40 if a
> > window manager complies with the Window Manager Specification Project
> > and keep only one a
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:37:27 -0800,
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Here's an updated version of Roland Rosenfeld's diff:
> [...]
> > + There must be a manual page at least for every program. If
> This would make it an
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:02:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > + It is not very hard to write a man page. See the > + id="http://www.schweikhardt.net/man_page_howto.html";
> > + name="Man-Page-HOWTO">, m
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:41:44PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> It turns out that just bumping the priority of x-window-managers like
> metacity which implement the EWMH spec isn't enough. Other window
> managers like twm still take priority, mainly because they support the
> Debian menu system d
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> + It is not very hard to write a man page. See the + id="http://www.schweikhardt.net/man_page_howto.html";
> + name="Man-Page-HOWTO">, man(7), the examples
> + created by debmake or dh_make, or
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:29:09PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Christian, could you look over it? The policy maintainers indicated to
> > me on IRC that they would only add it to policy after it had been
> > integrated, so if you are in agreeme
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:50:55AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 09:29, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
> > I disagree with that. Users already don't know how to setup the default
> > x-window manager, and now you want to introduce an new
> > update-alternative...
>
> Well, chan
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 09:29, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I disagree with that. Users already don't know how to setup the default
> x-window manager, and now you want to introduce an new
> update-alternative...
> Well, changing the alternatives is reall
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:56:35PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > + To avoid duplicate bug reports about missing manual pages,
> > + you should inform the user that you know about the missing
> > + manual page in
> > + /u
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 09:29, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I disagree with that. Users already don't know how to setup the default
> x-window manager, and now you want to introduce an new
> update-alternative...
Well, changing the alternatives is really only for advanced users. We
should advise us
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 20:53, Colin Walters wrote:
> I just made a full policy proposal. I think it should make everyone
> happy.
> http://bugs.debian.org/167004
> Christian, could you look over it? The policy maintainers indicated to
> me on IRC t
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> + To avoid duplicate bug reports about missing manual pages,
> + you should inform the user that you know about the missing
> + manual page in
> + /usr/share/doc/package/TODO.Debian.
Why not just remove this o
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:37:27AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Here's an updated version of Roland Rosenfeld's diff:
> [...]
> > + There must be a manual page at least for every program. If
>
> This would make it an RC bug if
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:09:25AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Here's an updated version of Roland Rosenfeld's diff:
[...]
> + There must be a manual page at least for every program. If
This would make it an RC bug if no man page exists. I don't think
that's what we want. (I know it's n
tags 39830 - fixed
retitle 39830 [AMENDMENT 30/10/2002] get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
thanks
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:54:08AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 16:26:50 +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > I proposed to change the "Manual pages" section of our policy to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 39830 - fixed
Bug#39830: [REJECTED] get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Tags removed: fixed
> retitle 39830 [AMENDMENT 30/10/2002] get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Bug#39830: [REJECTED] get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Changed Bug title.
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
