Chris Waters wrote:
> I think there is one argument against the proposal which has been
> completely overlooked: update-rc.d is consistent with other similar
> debian utilities like update-menus and update-alternatives. This is
> not a strong argument, but I don't see any strong arguments on eithe
I couldn't find in policy 3.5.7.0 any requirement that would allow an
autobuilder to know it should call "debian/rules build-arch" instead
of "debian/rules build", prior to call "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch".
I thought (as outlined in a related bugreport, although my words in
this report wer
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I feel it is very important every init script behave the same. However the
> wording of section 10.3.2 is confusing:
>
>The init.d scripts should ensure that they will behave sensibly if invoked
>with start when the service is already running, o
Hello developers,
I feel it is very important every init script behave the same. However the
wording of section 10.3.2 is confusing:
The init.d scripts should ensure that they will behave sensibly if invoked
with start when the service is already running, or with stop when it isn't,
and
4 matches
Mail list logo
