On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
# * Indra Kusuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-02 22:21]:
# > is it will be good if theres a Debian Policy changelog (!package
# > changelog) ?
#
# /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
Thanks alot martin :)
Cheers
Indra Kusuma
--
,'
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > Since 1.10 is now out and about and (AFAICT) has sane support for Enhances,
> > I would suggest that this bug be considered closed.
>
> No, it doesn't.
Are you contesting 'support' or 'sane'?
>From dpkg-1.10.6/C
gcj also by default searches in jars in /usr/share/java/ext.
The policy could add in 2.4:
Java libraries packages *may* add a sympolic link from
/usr/share/java/ext/packagename[-extraname].jar to
/usr/share/java/packagename[-extraname]-fullversion.jar.
In 2.1 Virtual machines:
If a virtual
* Indra Kusuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-02 22:21]:
> is it will be good if theres a Debian Policy changelog (!package
> changelog) ?
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi *,
is it will be good if theres a Debian Policy changelog (!package
changelog) ?
Cheers
Indra Kusuma
--
,''`. Indra{@,.}Kusuma.OR.ID -> [Security - Debian/GNU Linux - IPv6]
: :' : 0x4D829E49 - 187D 8C98 FB76 E1A8 5558 853A 4795 4FC1 4D82 9E49
`. `'
`-
Previously Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Since 1.10 is now out and about and (AFAICT) has sane support for Enhances,
> I would suggest that this bug be considered closed.
No, it doesn't.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just because dpkg recognizes a field, doesn't mean everything implements it
>yet. dselect/apt, need to handle it correctly.
>
>This appears fixed in cvs, which will be part of 1.10. But until it is
>verified as working correctly, and apt supports it, policy
Hi again.
I have not seen very much complains on the policy. Actually none
on fact.
So what further steps should I take in order to make this an
official policy?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:56:15PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There are some th
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Matthew> Based on the proposal's use of http://localhost/, or some
> Matthew> other criteria?
>
> Right now, if I arrange for images to be referenced in
> /var/www/, they are accessible elsewhere (I did something like that
> when I used to m
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Matthew> personally am particularly interested in #89867, which has
Matthew> been turned into an amendment, but hasn't had any sort of
Matthew> discussion or acceptance.
>>
>> Sinc
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Matthew> personally am particularly interested in #89867, which has
> Matthew> been turned into an amendment, but hasn't had any sort of
> Matthew> discussion or acceptance.
>
> Since the web browsers have not implemented the requisite
> cha
11 matches
Mail list logo
