[ No need to CC me, btw, despite the evil the BTS does to Reply-To ]
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 23:14, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> You might want to add a warning that this needs to be tested. Some
> packages, like glibc or the Hurd, can not be built without optimization
> (for example because of inlin
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Colin Walters wrote:
> The attached patch should mostly speak for itself. I think it's great
> that a lot of packages support DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug now, but if the
> program is compiled with optimization, it's very difficult to debug.
> --- debian-policy-3.5.6.1/policy.sgm
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:41:11PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The attached patch should mostly speak for itself. I think it's great
> that a lot of packages support DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug now, but if the
> program is compiled with optimization,
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
The attached patch should mostly speak for itself. I think it's great
that a lot of packages support DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug now, but if the
program is compiled with optimization, it's very difficult to debug.
Another alternative is to make a whole diffe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 155680 [ACCEPTED] bump priority of window managers which support WMSP
Bug#155680: [ PROPOSAL ] bump priority of window managers which support WMSP
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:43:06PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Well, are we basically in rough consensus about this now?
>
> Here's an updated patch which just makes the priority increase 20
> instead of 30.
I don't object.
--
G. Branden Robinson| "I came, I saw, she conq
6 matches
Mail list logo
