Colin Walters wrote:
>
> The single line synopsis should be kept brief - certainly
> - under 80 characters.
> + under 80 characters. This should be a sentence fragment
> + which summarizes the key features provided by the package.
> + It should no
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:43:02AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Colin" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin> Hi, this is not a major problem, but I'd like to see a bit more
> Colin> consistency among the package descriptions. The attached patch should
> Colin> be self-exp
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:10:14AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> cd /tmp/
> diff -u -L /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.sgml.gz -L
> /tmp/policy.sgml.new /tmp/jka-com6962AcG /tmp/policy.sgml.new
> --- /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.sgml.gz
> +++ /tmp/policy.sgml.new
> @@ -2397,7 +2397,9 @@
>>"era" == era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
era> The sections which recommend the use of set -e are IMHO a bit off the
era> mark. The recommendations imply that failing silently is a Good Thing
era> and that not handling errors sensibly is okay in shell scripts.
Really? If you
>>"Colin" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> Hi, this is not a major problem, but I'd like to see a bit more
Colin> consistency among the package descriptions. The attached patch should
Colin> be self-explanatory. A quick analysis of the Packages file suggests
Colin> there i
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:10:14AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi, this is not a major problem, but I'd like to see a bit more
> consistency among the package descriptions. The attached patch should
> be self-explanatory. A quick analy
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.1
Severity: normal
The sections which recommend the use of set -e are IMHO a bit off the
mark. The recommendations imply that failing silently is a Good Thing
and that not handling errors sensibly is okay in shell scripts.
In summary, relying on set -e to tra
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi, this is not a major problem, but I'd like to see a bit more
consistency among the package descriptions. The attached patch should
be self-explanatory. A quick analysis of the Packages file suggests
there is already a rough consensus in agree
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:49:34 -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm the current developer of the DebianDoc-SGML package.
(Just to clarify: my only concern is that the PostScript copy of the
Policy Manual is not 100% usable at the moment. I'm not laying the
blame on any parti
9 matches
Mail list logo
