* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 14:23]:
> Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 12:39]:
> >> Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 22:23]:
> >> >> Yes, but t
* Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011229 17:06]:
> The Online help question i asked and the debconf thread from a couple
> of weeks ago seem to point in the same direction.
>
> That is, we have nearly 1000 people working towards a hopefully common
> goal. They're all volunteers, and everybody
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 12:39]:
>> Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 22:23]:
>> >> Yes, but the spec is talking about *.lsb packages
* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 12:39]:
> Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 22:23]:
> >> Yes, but the spec is talking about *.lsb packages, NOT about
> >> *.deb or *.rpm packages. Those don't have to be changed.
> >
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 22:23]:
>> Yes, but the spec is talking about *.lsb packages, NOT about
>> *.deb or *.rpm packages. Those don't have to be changed.
>
>Really? I guess that could be. On w
* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020106 22:23]:
> Yes, but the spec is talking about *.lsb packages, NOT about
> *.deb or *.rpm packages. Those don't have to be changed.
Really? I guess that could be. On what basis do you make this
distinction?
--
-- Grant Bowman
6 matches
Mail list logo