On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 07:05:10PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I thought there was general agreement that a proportional limit was
> better than a simple number.
Maybe this is how you feel, but I so far haven't seen general agreement
on anything. Especially now that Anthony Towns has spo
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:14:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 05:51:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [Debian Policy group: I am not sure if the Debian Policy Manual is an
> > appropriate forum for any of the following material. I invite your
> > opinions.]
>
> -p
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 05:51:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Debian Policy group: I am not sure if the Debian Policy Manual is an
> appropriate forum for any of the following material. I invite your
> opinions.]
-policy is traditionally for technical policy, which the DFSG isn't. A
-legal
I thought there was general agreement that a proportional limit was
better than a simple number. One disadvantage to a simple per-package
limit is that you can defeat it by splitting something up into more
packages. A proportional limit seems more sensible to me.
Also, I think it should be a co
Previously Daniel Stone wrote:
> Oh, and also bear one thing in mind: the virtual host name (e.g. "foobar"
> in /var/vhosts/foobar) may not have any correlation to the hostname,
> domain, or whatever. So, please don't assume it does.
/var is the wrong place for this. There is a push to move FHS to
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 11:36:14PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Where exactly are you finding this incorrect URL?
>
> Like I said in the initial submission, and like the subject says, in the
> menu policy, and in the mime policy. Not the policy manual itself, but the
> two sub-policies.
Ah, gotc
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 11:04:56PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Where exactly are you finding this incorrect URL?
> >
> > Like I said in the initial submission, and like the subject says, in the
> > menu policy, and in the mime policy. Not the policy manual itself, but the
> > two sub-policie
[Debian Policy group: I am not sure if the Debian Policy Manual is an
appropriate forum for any of the following material. I invite your
opinions.]
[Debian GNU Emacsen maintainers: I'd appreciate your assistance in some
fact-finding; see particularly the end of this mail.]
Summary:
Per recent d
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 10:12:07PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Actually, which version of policy were you looking at? This was fixed
> > > in version 3.5.0.0, AFAICT.
> > >
> > > Closing this report.
> >
> > Uh, this is what I got from the the aforementioned FTP site :P I noticed
> > this
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 10:06:38PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 08:56:13PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > Note to self:
> > > >
> > > > Correct URLs are:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/mime-policy.txt.gz
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.deb
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2001 20:56:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME
policy and the menu policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 121977
Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu
policy
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
reopen 121977
thanks
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 08:56:13PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Note to self:
> > >
> > > Correct URLs are:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/mime-policy.txt.gz
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/menu-policy.txt.gz
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 07:48:50PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > These two links:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/mime_policy.txt
> >
> > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/menu-policy.txt
> >
> > They are in
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 03:25:54PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
>
> Hi,
>
> These two links:
>
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/mime_policy.txt
>
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/menu-policy.txt
>
> They are incorrect. Please fix them
Package: debian-policy
Hi,
These two links:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/mime_policy.txt
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/package-developer/menu-policy.txt
They are incorrect. Please fix them (the correction should be obvious :). TIA.
--
2. That which causes joy or h
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 01:52:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:40:43PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > "A unified system for virtual hosting system [sic] was needed ...".
> > > It's not sufficient to just declare the need and use that as
> > > the rationale. Please e
17 matches
Mail list logo
