Re: packages without .md5sums file?

2001-07-28 Thread Adam Heath
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > In contrast, if the md5sums are stored in the package on CD, verification > is easy: You just need to boot from the (trusted) CD, and kick off the > comparison with the CD content. It is easier to trust a list of checksums > mirrored world wide and

Re: packages without .md5sums file?

2001-07-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marcus> I think that the checksums should be in the package, and Marcus> burned on CDs along with the package, so you can verify them Marcus> more easily. If the package is signed, or if there is a Packages file on the CD with

Bug#100346: seconding this proposal

2001-07-28 Thread Branden Robinson
I hereby second this proposal. The original proposer did not supply any proposed textual changes to policy, so I suggest the following as replacement text for the first paragraph of 11.2: In general, libraries must b

Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion

2001-07-28 Thread Andreas Bombe
retitle 100472 [AMENDMENT 2001-07-28] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion severity 100472 normal thanks On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:55:38AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote: > Seconded. It's a "may" and not a "must", gives more meaningful > package names, and documents current practice. >

Processed: Re: Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion

2001-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 100472 [AMENDMENT 2001-07-28] allowing '-' between libraryname and > soversion Bug#100472: [PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Changed Bug title. > severity 100472 normal Bug#100472: [AMENDMENT 2001-07-28] allowing '-' be