> "JH" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> Edward C. Lang wrote:
>> All suggestions, comments, critisicms, and volunteers are
>> welcome.
JH> I just suggest that you don't forget the existing debian FAQ.
Hmm, good, because my new computer turned up on a pallet
today.
Edward C. Lang wrote:
> All suggestions, comments, critisicms, and volunteers are welcome.
I just suggest that you don't forget the existing debian FAQ.
--
see shy jo
On Monday 02 July 2001 9:03 pm, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:14:47AM +1000, Edward C. Lang wrote:
> > So, this is my informal announcement that I may, time allowing,
> > start a rough FAQ that can either possibly deflect and derail
> > wanton behaviour on the lists, and also s
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:14:47AM +1000, Edward C. Lang wrote:
> So, this is my informal announcement that I may, time allowing, start a
> rough FAQ that can either possibly deflect and derail wanton behaviour
> on the lists, and also serve as pointer to other interesting
> documentation about th
Hi
Edward C. Lang schrieb:
> So, this is my informal announcement that I may, time allowing, start a
> rough FAQ that can either possibly deflect and derail wanton behaviour
> on the lists, and also serve as pointer to other interesting
> documentation about the Project.
>
> All suggestions, comm
Hi,
Due to the excessive flammage of the LSB on the debian-devel mailing
list, some people started discussing it on IRC. This came of it:
[12:06AM] what we need
[12:06AM] (and what everybody needs)
[12:06AM] is a completely buttkicking Debian FAQ
[12:06AM] that is answered based on policy, in
6 matches
Mail list logo
