Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) There is more than one implementation of libGL available in Debian;
> bumping one to standard would require choosing one.
Can the different implementations we have now co-exist?
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) There is more than one implementation of libGL available in Debian;
> bumping one to standard would require choosing one.
> 2) If Xlib is optional, I would be hard pressed to believe that libGL
> should be standard.
> 3) Surely we can be co
> I disagree with this proposal on a number of grounds:
>
> 1) There is more than one implementation of libGL available in Debian;
> bumping one to standard would require choosing one.
> 2) If Xlib is optional, I would be hard pressed to believe that libGL
> should be standard.
> 3) Surely we can
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 102917 debian-policy
Bug#102917: please change priority
Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa3' to `debian-policy'.
> severity 102917 wishlist
Bug#102917: please change priority
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> retitle 102917 [PROPOSED] make Mes
reassign 102917 debian-policy
severity 102917 wishlist
retitle 102917 [PROPOSED] make Mesa/GL libraries standard priority per LSB
thanks
I disagree with this proposal on a number of grounds:
1) There is more than one implementation of libGL available in Debian;
bumping one to standard would requi
6 matches
Mail list logo
