Re: Resolving policy and practice wrt sbin directories (traceroute)

2001-06-27 Thread Rene Weber
Hello, On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:18:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > And here we go again. Policy is *not* a set of hard and fast rules for > building packages. It has bugs, it's missing exceptions that should be > there, it doesn't cover everything that should be covered, it suggests > sub

Bug#36151: Clearing out old policy proposals

2001-06-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 07:09:30PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:26:20AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > > misconfigured, then that solves his problem. Does the general > > suggestion retain much value, though? > > Personally I don't see why a root user should have a PA

Processed: Bug#102204: Make amendment

2001-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 102204 [AMENDMENT 2001/06/26] Downgrade emacs/tex to optional Bug#102204: [AMENDMENT 2001/06/26] Downgrade emacs/tex to optional Changed Bug title. > severity 102204 normal Bug#102204: [AMENDMENT 2001/06/26] Downgrade emacs/tex to optional Bug#

Processed: Bug#102199: Make amendment

2001-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 102199 [AMENDMENT 2001/06/26] Next stage in usr/doc -> usr/share/doc > transition Bug#102199: [AMENDMENT 2001/06/26] Next stage in usr/doc -> usr/share/doc transition Changed Bug title. > severity 102199 normal Bug#102199: [AMENDMENT 2001/06/

Re: Resolving policy and practice wrt sbin directories (traceroute)

2001-06-27 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 12:02:27AM -0400, Rene Weber wrote: > [...] Do we > really mean "must" for FHS compatibility if we are advocating ignoring its > directives for the sbin directories? And here we go again. Policy is *not* a set of hard and fast rules for building packages. It has bugs, it'