Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>>
>> I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
>> as well. My rationale is that init.d scripts are intended (and mostly
> Please see the original proposal: th
Hello Anthony,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:43:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Find some perspective, and worry about something that actually matters
> instead? This ain't the end of the world, it ain't the camel's straw,
> and it ain't the ladder leading towards a slippery-dip.
I respec
On 23-Jun-01, 17:36 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
> > > /bin (and /u
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
> > /bin (and /usr/bin/X11?) should append that directory to the PATH
>
> I'd really like to
Here is the proposal with typos and mistakes fixed, with added
paragraph about possible use of other encodings. I left out
the requirenment to specify a font needed to view the
documentation, since IMHO that is overcomplication and
unnecessary.
--- policy.sgml-old Fri Jun 1 11:40:16 2001
+++
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:18:48PM -0400, Rene Weber wrote:
> I would like to ask the opinion of debian-policy readers on how to deal
> with the discrepancy between Debian Policy and practice with regards to the
> FHS and the use of /usr/sbin and /sbin.
Find some perspective, and worry about
Activadores biológicos naturales para eliminar olores en pozos sépticos,
depuradoras, etc.
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/odour.htm
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/fosassepticaspozossepticos.htm
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/envios
Hello,
I would like to ask the opinion of debian-policy readers on how to deal
with the discrepancy between Debian Policy and practice with regards to the
FHS and the use of /usr/sbin and /sbin. As I have argued extensively
elsewhere[1], Policy mandates that we "must"[2] follow the FHS an
8 matches
Mail list logo