Re: last-minute patches? (was Re: Moving Policy to Docbook)

2001-06-21 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:56:33PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Given that policy is supposed to be mostly frozen (barring bug > > fixes) [...] > This is a trivial, -2+3 line patch which resolves an apparent > self-contradiction

Bug#36151: Clearing out old policy proposals

2001-06-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 07:44:59AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Bug #36151: etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH > > > Summary: init.d scripts shouldn't depend on having PATH set in a > > useful manner -- they should explicitly set the

Re: Moving Policy to Docbook

2001-06-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Now that I am back home (well, at least until USENIX), I am > have a modicum of time to spend on policy stuff. Given that policy is > supposed to be mostly frozen (barring bug fixes), I'm going to start > th

Re: Bug#101162: Oversite in file placement for web applications

2001-06-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, How about /debian//images? Or are there packages that share icons and other objects and this shall result in duplication? manoj -- Computers can figure out all kinds of problems, except the things in the world that just don't add up. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#101147: base-files: Include LaTeX Project Common License in /usr/share/common-licenses/

2001-06-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> It would be nice if the current version of the LaTeX Project >> Public License (LPPL) was included with the licenses in >> /usr/share/common-licenses/. How many packages are there under this license? Seems to me that i

last-minute patches? (was Re: Moving Policy to Docbook)

2001-06-21 Thread Chris Waters
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Given that policy is supposed to be mostly frozen (barring bug > fixes) [...] I don't have any advice to offer on the docbook conversion (except "yay"), but I would like to call the policy editors' attention to #98291, which is i

Moving Policy to Docbook

2001-06-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi Folks, Now that I am back home (well, at least until USENIX), I am have a modicum of time to spend on policy stuff. Given that policy is supposed to be mostly frozen (barring bug fixes), I'm going to start the process of converting policy into docbook format. If anyone has done any