Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.
Your message has been sent to the pac
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Introduction:
After a lot of discussion, AJ and I have settled on a compromise that is
acceptable to both of us about what to do to fix Debian's broken[1] task
system.
Essentially, we propose throwing out all existing task packages, no
longer using pa
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Richard Braakman wrote:
>On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:42:15PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
>> stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
>
>It says "the modified files". Keeping a sep
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: jdg Wed May 16 15:55:23 PDT 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml upgrading-checklist.html
debian : changelog
Log message:
* Improving 11.1 -- 11.6
* Small improvements to up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 94995 [ACCEPTED 16/05/2001] Clarifying instructions on linking man
> pages
Bug#94995: [AMENDMENT 01/05/2001] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Changed Bug title.
> forwarded 94995 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#94995: [ACCEPTED 16/05/2001] C
retitle 94995 [ACCEPTED 16/05/2001] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
forwarded 94995 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Tue, 01 May 2001 at 20:24:51 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> retitle 94995 [AMENDMENT 01/05/2001] Clarifying instructions on linking man
> pages
> severity 94995 normal
> than
On 15-May-01, 13:35 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who cares about changelogs if there is no requirement that they tell
> the truth?
Because *most* developers will have correct (and possibly even useful)
changelogs most of the time. If a few don't, then people will complain,
an
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:42:15PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
> stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
It says "the modified files". Keeping a separate ChangeLog does
not meet this requirement; the
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Who cares about changelogs if there is no requirement that they tell
> the truth?
I've always thought changelogs were necessary because GPL wants this :
2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus
9 matches
Mail list logo
