Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi, >>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: Anthony> Since people are already filing RC bugs about it: Anthony> --- policy.sgml Sun Apr 29 05:10:09 2001 Anthony> +++ policy.sgml.std Fri May 11 11:10:09 2001 Anthony> @@ -1186,9 +1186,9 @@ Anthony> In

Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)

>>"Philippe" == Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Philippe> and since the policy does not explicitely prohibit it a Philippe> re-packaged xv like this. This is a flawed argument. Policy is never meant to be all encompassing, or even a good practices booklet. So there are a nu

Processed: make amendment

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 97072 [AMENDMENT 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on > standards-version Bug#97072: [PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Changed Bug title. > severity 97072 normal Bug#97072: [AMENDMENT 2001/05/11] correct

Bug#97072: make amendment

retitle 97072 [AMENDMENT 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version severity 97072 normal thanks This is correcting an error, so deadline for discussion in seven days, ie 2001/05/18. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't speak

Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!

> "Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to remind people that Menu policy says that icon images > used in the Debian menu system should be no larger than 32x32. > Unfortunately, people seem to be sticking in any old image they can > find, these days. While we are on t

Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > --- policy.sgml Sun Apr 29 05:10:09 2001 > +++ policy.sgml.std Fri May 11 11:10:09 2001 > @@ -1186,9 +1186,9 @@ > > > In the source package's Standards-Version control > - field, you must specify the most recent vers

Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version

On 10-May-01, 20:11 (CDT), Anthony Towns wrote: > --- policy.sgml Sun Apr 29 05:10:09 2001 > +++ policy.sgml.std Fri May 11 11:10:09 2001 > @@ -1186,9 +1186,9 @@ > > > In the source package's Standards-Version control > - field, you must specify the most rec

Bug#97072: [PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version

Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Version: 3.5.4.0 *sigh* Since people are already filing RC bugs about it: --- policy.sgml Sun Apr 29 05:10:09 2001 +++ policy.sgml.std Fri May 11 11:10:09 2001 @@ -1186,9 +1186,9 @@ In the source package's Standards-Version c

reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!

I'd like to remind people that Menu policy says that icon images used in the Debian menu system should be no larger than 32x32. Unfortunately, people seem to be sticking in any old image they can find, these days. I've filed a couple of bug reports against a couple of the most egregious offenders

Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)

On Thu, 10 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote: >... > People who read policy like rules lawyers are often disappointed and > often do foolish things. Please bring common sense with you when you > open the policy manual. When I read the policy like a lawyer I get answers like "this was not intended" and wh

Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > could someone else please read the discussion in #96458 answer Philippe? > > I'm tired of this frustrating discussion with someone who tried to make > > xv a native Debain package. > > Well Phil is clearly ignoring the intent of polic

Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)

Adrian Bunk wrote: > could someone else please read the discussion in #96458 answer Philippe? > I'm tired of this frustrating discussion with someone who tried to make > xv a native Debain package. Well Phil is clearly ignoring the intent of policy, the reasons we have a .orig.tar.gz in the first

Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)

Hi, could someone else please read the discussion in #96458 answer Philippe? I'm tired of this frustrating discussion with someone who tried to make xv a native Debain package. TIA Adrian PS: Please Cc me because I'm not on this list. -- Forwarded message -- Date: 07 May 2001 1

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:51:30PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > [ ulterior motivation: one of my packages has a dependency on a purely > virtual package without an alternative, and the information got there > by means of a shlibs file. I want to know if it's my package at fault > or th

Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)

Hi Using debconf for tasks would also make all the current and future interfaces available for task selection. Joey Hess schrieb: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/newtasksel>./tasksel -t tasklist > Selecting software to install > - > > A Debian system can be used for many ta

Use of Debian offical logo

Hi, I'm just a plain Debian fan and I like to print t-shirts for myself and my collegues with debian official logo on it. These t-shirts are not mean for sale. Is it possible?. Thanks Debian forever. Hisham Ismail