Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> That's not the real reason. Take the definition of build-essential
> packages from policy. It specifies that the list will not cantain any
> packages that are optional in building a package that contains a C or
> C++ program. It should be clear to everybody that d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 42052 + fixed
Bug#42052: [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail
Tags added: fixed
> tag 83977 + fixed
Bug#83977: [AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy
Tags added: fixed
> tag 85503 + fixed
Bug#85503: section 3.1 of policy is confused
Installing:
debian-policy_3.5.4.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.4.0.tar.gz
fhs.txt byhand
fhs-2.1.html.tar.gz byhand
policy.txt.gz byhand
perl-policy.txt.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.5.4.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.4.0.dsc
menu-policy.txt.gz byhand
tag 42052 + fixed
tag 83977 + fixed
tag 85503 + fixed
tag 86436 + fixed
tag 87233 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:30:21 -0500
Source
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: jdg Sun Apr 29 17:13:43 PDT 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
* Improvements to section 7.1
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:00:07AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
> >
> > Package: cvs (debian/main)
> > Maintainer: Eric Gillespie, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 95263 missing build dependency
>
> The policy says:
>
> A source package may dec
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: jdg Sun Apr 29 15:49:24 PDT 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
* Couple of minor changes reported
by philippe batailler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 07:05:40PM +0200, philippe batailler wrote:
> Debian policy : cvs version 1.46
Thanks, about to change in CVS.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 07:05:40PM +0200, philippe batailler wrote:
> quote---
> This is what will install by default if the user doesn't select anything
>^^
>what will be installed ?
That one's not exactly wrong, but it is a bit colloquial. And
anthropomorphic. (The
Debian policy : cvs version 1.46
chap 1 sect 1.1
quote---
definitions. (Control file and and changelog file formats are examples.)
^^^
quote---
this policy document. Packages that do not conform the the guidelines denoted
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +Shared object files (i.e. libsoname.so) that are
>
>Seth Arnold noticed (in a private mail to me) how this stuff in parenthesis
>shouldn't be there (my mistake), because the plugins can be named
>differently -- the file name makes no practical diff
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 11:36:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> +to by third party executables (binaries of other packages),
> >> +should be installed in the subdirectories of the
> Richard> ^^^
>
> Richard> I would drop that "the", to make clea
On 20010423T091432-0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> It's been discussed before. The problem is that most
> debhelper Build-Depends actually need to be versioned[1], which won't
> work with build-essential.
That's not the real reason. Take the definition of build-essential
packages from policy. It
13 matches
Mail list logo
