On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 05:01:01PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Wow.. This is the second time I've had a reply to this post from someone
> assuming I was "gay-bashing" or some such thing.
>
> In the immortal words of Jerry Seinfeld "Not that there's anything wrong
> with that!"
actually thats the
Wow.. This is the second time I've had a reply to this post from someone
assuming I was "gay-bashing" or some such thing.
In the immortal words of Jerry Seinfeld "Not that there's anything wrong
with that!"
I just happen to be straight. Nothing wrong with that, either.
Besides that, the entire
* Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010406 06:09]:
> > > Is the problem that it should be "GNU General Public Licence" instead?
> >
> > Sure, just like all other occurences - only this one is incorrect.
>
> so it is the GGPL then?
No, GNU GPL.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20010406T060953-1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> so it is the GGPL then?
No, it's GNU GPL.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:03:00PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > There is an occurence of this in in
> > > section
> >
> > Is the problem that it should be "GNU General Public Licence" instead?
>
> Sure, just like all other occu
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:00:08PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Joey,
>
> I think I'm in love with you... In a non-gay kinda way. :)
oh, so theres something wrong with being gay is there?
- bri, skipping around the room, happy and gay
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[E
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:21:01PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Taral!
> > >
> > > You wrote:
> > >
> > > > It should most certainly be debian/rulz, not rulez.
> > >
> > > Why not m
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:23:59PM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:59:14 -0300, Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So, I propose we make clear that we are indeed '1337 and rename the
> > > debian/rule
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:03:00PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > There is an occurence of this in in
> > section
>
> Is the problem that it should be "GNU General Public Licence" instead?
Sure, just like all other occurences - only this one is incorrect.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9 matches
Mail list logo
