On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:50:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > + To be an x-terminal-emulator, a program must:
> > +
> > + Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 terminal, or a compatible
> > + terminal.
>
> are there
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:35:12PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> not really relevant to -www anymore.
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:36:07PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > There have been attempted ports to other platforms, although none has been
> > completed yet.
> >
> > The formal package 'arch n
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001
> +++ policy.sgml.x-terminal-emulator Sun Mar 25 02:17:56 2001
> @@ -5976,13 +5976,31 @@
>
>
> Packages that provide a terminal emulator for the X
> - Window S
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:45:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:19:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:06:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Summary:
> > > History:
> > > Technical reasoning:
> > > Issues:
> > > Caveats:
> >
> > But nowher
not really relevant to -www anymore.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:36:07PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> There have been attempted ports to other platforms, although none has been
> completed yet.
>
> The formal package 'arch name' for hurd is 'hurd-i386', so I'd guess that
> the plan is to have other
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:50:36AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > > > which is really a system dependent th
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:28:39AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > Um... how? It only works if debian/rules is a makefile, which is
> > precisely my point.
>
> Policy 5.2: (debian/rules - the main building script)
>
> This file must be an executable makefile...
Had you bothered to read #88029 which Ric
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Um... how? It only works if debian/rules is a makefile, which is
> precisely my point.
Policy 5.2: (debian/rules - the main building script)
This file must be an executable makefile...
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use P
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:50:36AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > > which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want
> > > parallel builds will invoke debian/rule
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want
> > parallel builds will invoke debian/rules itself with -j 3. I don't
> > believe it belongs in the rules
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want
> parallel builds will invoke debian/rules itself with -j 3. I don't
> believe it belongs in the rules file itself.
That reasoning only works if we reject the proposal in #880
11 matches
Mail list logo
