On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:24:41AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 09:01:23AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > IMO, it should say "packages SHOULD change the docs to match the package
> > setup", and "there MUST be a disclaimer when docs do not match the
> > package", and "the di
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 09:01:23AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> IMO, it should say "packages SHOULD change the docs to match the package
> setup", and "there MUST be a disclaimer when docs do not match the
> package", and "the disclaimer SHOULD be in the upstream doc itself, or in
> a the README.Deb
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: normal
Section 3.2 begins:
3.2 List of fields
This list here is not supposed to be exhaustive. Most fields
are dealt with elsewhere in this document and in the packaging
manual.
Because the packaging manual is supposed to be incor
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 08:07:56AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> As such, I would not like to see a MUST added to policy for updating upstream
> docs.
>
I think it should atleast say "Some of the locations and features depend
on how the program was compiled and installed". This is what it say
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've put the library in /usr/lib/debauch but the warning remains.
> >
> > The symlink itself triggers the warning whereever is located the
> > library.
>
> You can't move the symlink as well? libfakeroot does. If you
I also moved the symlink.
> "Henrique" == Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think that all documentation must reflect the Debian
>> locations of configuration and other files, and that manpages
>> and the like should be altered as necessary to achieve this.
>> =20 Comments?
Henri
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> >Is the library is never linked against directly, then I think it's best
> >to put it somewhere other than in /usr/lib/. That removes some
> >possibility of confusion, both in Lintian and in users' minds.
> >(Compare with libfak
>Is the library is never linked against directly, then I think it's best
>to put it somewhere other than in /usr/lib/. That removes some
>possibility of confusion, both in Lintian and in users' minds.
>(Compare with libfakeroot, for example.)
I've put the library in /usr/lib/debauch but the warn
Well, I had not done much on this since that time :(
Joey suggested:
Here is one way we could reword policy:
| 2.3.6. The base system
--
|
| The base system is a minimum subset of the Debian GNU/Linux system that is
installed before everything else on a new system.
9 matches
Mail list logo
