Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses

2000-12-14 Thread Chris Waters
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote: > But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes common, > and putting it into the common-licenses directory is one step toward > making that happen. I would describe it more as putting the cart before the horse. At

Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses

2000-12-14 Thread Susan G. Kleinmann
> But is it really a common license? Perhaps dh_make's template manual page > should be corrected instead. I understand and appreciate the desirability of keeping the base-files package small. But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes common, and putting it into the common-lice

Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses

2000-12-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:29:53PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote: > Package: base-files > Version: 2.2.4 > Severity: Normal > > The debhelper script dh_make inserts a sample manpage.sgml.ex file into > a new debian directory when a package is being built. This sample file > refers to the Free D