[PROPOSED] release management

[See http://bugs.debian.org/34673 for background] I'd like to propose that we make explicit some guidelines about how well we support our various releases. I'm not proposing that these be retroactive -- the examples are just meant as clarification. The part of this I'm least certain about is the

Processed: New virtual packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 77404 [ACCEPTED] New virtual packages Bug#77404: new virtual packages Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#77404: New virtual packages

retitle 77404 [ACCEPTED] New virtual packages thanks I believe that these can now be included in the virtual package list: -- start of list -- telnet-server Any telnet server rsh-server Any rsh server telnet-client Any telnet client -- end of list -- Note: ftp-c

Bug#79210: orig.tar.gz definition and reality are out of sync

Previously Chris Waters wrote: > However, last time the topic was raised, the packaging manual was just > a manual. Now that it has the effect of policy, I think that it's > probably imperative that we change it to reflect what we really want > ASAP. The packaging manual is not part of official p