Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 47438 debian-policy
Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating?
Bug reassigned from package `spam' to `debian-policy'.
> reassign 53109 general
Bug#53109: www.debian.org: Package descriptions need link to package home page.
Bug reassigned f
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:39:13PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
>
> > If Debian decides that bug reports should go to Debian unless
> > we've modified the package, that's what we'll do.
>
> We have no control over it. If evil-third-party Debian r
> > > Origin: Debian
> > > Bugs-To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Which is clearly entirely reasonable and legitimate.
> >
> > No, it's not. If you want to make a package special instead of making it
> > an integral part of Debian change the Origin tag.
>
> What? It comes from Debian and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 47438 general
Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating?
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
reassign 47438 general
thanks
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:30:05AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> reassign 47438 spam
> thanks
Don't do that, he just cluttered an existing, valid bug report. I'll try to
clean it up...
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:55:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 02:22:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:51:32PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
> > > [...] though Anthony Towns indicated [...]
> > I'm fairly sure I did no such thing.
> I t
reassign 47438 spam
thanks
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hu
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 05:55:31 + (UTC),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) said:
> (FWIW, I disagree with Eric that environment variables
> should override command-line options. The real mistake was
That was a mistake on my part. It wasn't difficult to convince me
that i was wrong. My
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:23:09 + (UTC),
aj@azure.humbug.org.au (Anthony Towns) said:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:51:32PM -0500, Eric Gillespie,
> Jr. wrote:
>> I agree with this, and this is what prompted my original
>> followup. This seems like a win for both sides, though
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:55:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 02:22:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:51:32PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
> > > I agree with this, and this is what prompted my original
> > > followup. This seems like
10 matches
Mail list logo