* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001029 18:54]:
> Maybe some upgrades should just be labelled "reboot recommended"?
It will be a sad day when this happens. :( I think it is a strong
selling point when I tell my MS friends, tired of rebooting after
installing a new web browser, that one can
>
> On this topic, I'm trying to get Oracle working. Since as we all know libc6
> 2.2 is "perfectly compatible" it ought to work :) In reality it doesn't work
> so I'm trying to get it to use the old libc6. Someone on this list claimed you
> could have the two installed simultaneously but it doesn
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:56:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:04:54PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> qmail(-src) can be added to the list too. Somehow it kept sucking
> up disk space that I could not find. Kill and restart freed
> and fixed that.
>
> I don't kno
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We need to find a way to not require the restarts. Perhaps the nss modules
> > could provide the old nss functions as versioned 2.0 symbols?
> >
> > (Sigh, this would all go away if people just bumped sonames when they had
> > to.)
>
> This isn't a
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:04:54PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
qmail(-src) can be added to the list too. Somehow it kept sucking
up disk space that I could not find. Kill and restart freed
and fixed that.
I don't know a lot about shared libs. My understanding is that
as long as something is usin
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 07:27:23PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:23:43PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I'm tired of having to track all services that might need to be
> > > restarted after a libc6 upgrade. So here
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:23:43PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'm tired of having to track all services that might need to be
> > restarted after a libc6 upgrade. So here's what I am going to do. I want
> > to require all packages that need thi
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 09:22:02AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
> Anthony> Which will kludge up postinsts from now to forever, be an
> Anthony> extra source for bugs, and make changing things in future
> Anthony> awkward.
> I don't think we should
(Please don't Cc: me on these mails)
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 09:07:38AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
> Anthony> dpkg already knows this, and it can already be determined
> Anthony> by looking for "Unpacking ..." or "Setting up ...".
> >> - current
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> Which will kludge up postinsts from now to forever, be an
Anthony> extra source for bugs, and make changing things in future
Anthony> awkward.
I don't think we should downgrade the capability of future debian
products, either just for
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> dpkg already knows this, and it can already be determined
Anthony> by looking for "Unpacking ..." or "Setting up ...".
>> - current task for this package, as generated by dpkg-log
Anthony> Which is exactly what this would be outp
11 matches
Mail list logo
