> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Once they're in the file system, they won't only elevate
Raul> privilege. At that point, programs can be denied privilege
Raul> (even if the user process has the capability, the program
Raul> will drop it).
Raul> I
On 29-Sep-2000 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:40:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> >> the whole "your library has no shlibs file" thing. Once a policy has
>> >> been
>> >> approved for packages with dynamically loaded modules lintian will be
>> >> brought
>> >> up to date
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:40:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >> the whole "your library has no shlibs file" thing. Once a policy has been
> >> approved for packages with dynamically loaded modules lintian will be
> >> brought
> >> up to date.
> >
> > Simple policy: .so files that are no
On 29-Sep-2000 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> Current issues:
>> the whole "your library has no shlibs file" thing. Once a policy has been
>> approved for packages with dynamically loaded modules lintian will be
>> brought
>> up to date.
>
> Simple policy: .so
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 12:29:30AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > the whole "your library has no shlibs file" thing. Once a policy has
> > been approved for packages with dynamically loaded modules lintian will
> > be brought up to date.
>
> Simple policy: .so files that are not in /lib, /usr
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: normal
Could we please raise the minimum Standards-Version required for
woody to include Build-Depends.
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux alpha 2
> Raul> [Also: both have extra baggage, but MAC+capabilities looks
> Raul> like something safer to switch over to than capabilities
> Raul> without MAC.]
>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:20:22PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Where can I find out more about MAC? MAC is a completely new acronym
7 matches
Mail list logo
