Re: PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread Anthony Towns
debian-user trimmed. On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 10:31:14PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 19, John Ackermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I heartily agree with Daniel's plea. Eveb a simple listing of what > >configuration files the package uses (and where they are), and where it > >stores

Re: PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread Steve Bowman
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 12:55:25PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > silly. I venture to guess that 80% of all packages have a binary that > matches the package name, and don't need *any* (re)configuration. And > of the remainder, most do have adequate documentation already. I haven't checked recentl

Re: PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> >I heartily agree with Daniel's plea. Eveb a simple listing of what > >configuration files the package uses (and where they are), and where it > >stores data (i.e., does it use space in /var) would be a big help. > less /var/lib/dpkg/info/.list > > If you really care, write a nice wrapper

Re: PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 19, John Ackermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I heartily agree with Daniel's plea. Eveb a simple listing of what >configuration files the package uses (and where they are), and where it >stores data (i.e., does it use space in /var) would be a big help. less /var/lib/dpkg/info/.list

Re: PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread John Ackermann
> > Why don't all Debian packages come with installation instructions > in a _standard_ place that tell you what you need to do (after > installing the package) to configure or use the package you just > loaded? I heartily agree with Daniel's plea. Eveb a simple listing of what configuration

Re: PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread Chris Waters
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 03:23:22PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote: > Why don't all Debian packages come with installation instructions > in a _standard_ place that tell you what you need to do (after > installing the package) to configure or use the package you just > loaded? Most Debian packages

PLEASE: standard package README file/orientation

2000-08-19 Thread Daniel Barclay
Why don't all Debian packages come with installation instructions in a _standard_ place that tell you what you need to do (after installing the package) to configure or use the package you just loaded? There needs to be a standard place to consult to know what a package needs (setup) and what i

Bug#69426: [PATCH] typos and awkwardness in policy.sgml

2000-08-19 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.0.0 There are a few misspellings in policy.sgml, as well as some awkward sentences. And the example of how to use update-rc.d when removing a package incorrectly refers to acct instead of bind. The following patches fixes these problems. Matt --- policy.sgml

Bug#69424: [PATCH] typos in menu-policy.sgml

2000-08-19 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.0.0 There are a few misspellings in menu-policy.sgml. The following patch fixes them. Matt --- menu-policy.sgml.orig Sat Aug 19 08:20:22 2000 +++ menu-policy.sgmlSat Aug 19 08:21:31 2000 @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ 2 or (at your option) any later. The