Re: Updating policy

2000-07-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Manoj! I got my numbers wrong; it'll be 3.2.0.0. My latest changes are all checked in to CVS. I had been working my way through the BTS when I got interrupted to arrange my visa to teach for five weeks in Vancouver. I'm due to fly tomorrow and don't yet have it I was working through the

Bug#65577: Amended] copyright should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution

2000-07-10 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. On "Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:04:02 -0400", Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you think that "All the packages in the other sections" should be > > also modified to "All the packages in non-free or contrib sections" ? > > No. Not really. OK, I see. > > What I wish to see is more e

Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently

2000-07-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 08:41:35PM -0500, David Engel wrote: > > > Maybe we should define the default directories that every ld.so.conf file > > > should contain - /lib /usr/lib /usr/X11R6/lib - and mark every other > > /lib and /usr/lib are always included implicitly, unless ldconfig is > told no

Re: Updating policy

2000-07-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, This message is about a month old, and I have seen no objections. Is there a status update that I just missed in all the traffic? Could I help? manoj >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Julian> Does anyone have any objections to me uploading

Re: Policy updating?

2000-07-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi folks, Could I ask what the status of the policy update is? Julian, if you could check in your changes, perhaps we could work towards some release here? I have come to the conclusion that perhaps waiting for a consensus or dictum would be a long wait, and I think policy has