On 04-Jul-00, 18:05 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So are people happy with changing the wording of the last two lines to
> read:
>
>otherwise they must go in non-free.
>
FWIW, I'm happy with that.
steve greenland
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I propose prepending text like the following to section 4.3.
> >
> > Shared libraries are .so files containing compiled
> > code that are loaded by th
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:21:57PM +0100, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 04:42:37PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > You wrote:
> >
> > >Programs whose authors encourage the user to make donations are fine
> > >for the main distribution, provided that the authors do not claim t
> Do you think that "All the packages in the other sections" should be
> also modified to "All the packages in non-free or contrib sections" ?
No. Not really.
> What I wish to see is more explanation for users. Many ordinary users
> are not specialists in license. In many cases, they may not und
4 matches
Mail list logo
