Brian May wrote:
> Seeing as everything seems to be going XML these days, why not:
Why? Copyright files are already unapproachable enough with their legal
jargon. Why add markup on top of that?
> However, why stop at the license? Perhaps the same thing could be
> done with other information, eg r
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> All that is needed now are some patches to dinstall and apt to be able
> to handle this ;-) (I presume that the Packages.du.bz2 file would be
> generated on a weekly basis in unstable, a bit like the Contents
> files.)
Writing a contents generator sho
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:14:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#38703: [OLD PROPOSAL] A better way to configure debian
systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
This bug report contains a proposal to modify dinstall and apt to be
able to calculate the amount of space needed by packages before they
are installed, so that apt can say "sorry, there isn't enough space
left to install package foo". Furthermore, this will be calculated
using du -S so that the s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 38902 ftp.debian.org
Bug#38902: [ACCEPTED 07/16/99] Data section
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 38902 normal
Bug#38902: [ACCEPTED 07/16/99] Data section
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping
reassign 38902 ftp.debian.org
severity 38902 normal
thanks
The creation of the data section now rests in the hands of the ftp
team.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:22:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#39408: Policy self-reference broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:13:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#38612: [PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in
policy package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: jdg Fri Jun 23 09:37:49 PDT 2000
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
debian : changelog copyright rules
Log message:
* Added FHS details to copyright file
* Added wording for bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 32263 wishlist
Bug#32263: [PROPOSAL] Splitting cgi-bin
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 32263 [PROPOSAL] Splitting cgi-bin
Bug#32263: [OLD PROPOSAL] Split /cgi-bin/ into system and local parts
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs
retitle 32263 [PROPOSAL] Splitting cgi-bin
thanks
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 10:09:39PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> reopen 32263
> --
>
> How about waiting just a bit longer? I was going to try to start this
> again when (if?) the release happens. Numerous people have thought it
> was a good idea
> "Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Julian> Copyright: non-DFSG Copyright-non-freeness: # Brief
Julian> details of non-freeness here Copyright-Details: # field
Julian> with copy of copyright
Julian> Comments?
Seeing as everything seems to be going XML the
13 matches
Mail list logo
