Brian Mays wrote:
> > As was mentioned earlier in this thread, the README.Debian file is
> > best reserved for changes in the *behavior* of the package, not in
> > the changes to the source tree.
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added:
> Assuming you're referring to this from Josip:
>
> > A m
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I agree that the summary should not be part of the changelog, but it
> never made sense to me that it was in the copyright file, either. The
> obvious place to me would be README.Debian.
As was mentioned earlier in this thread, the README.Debian file is
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Ditto; leaving it in copyright also makes it easy to remember to change
> it if the license becomes more free in the future: you're just editing the
> one file.
Actually, I had never thought of it that way, but it is true. I have had
a package go from non-free to free, a
3 matches
Mail list logo
