Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy

2000-06-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Anthony Towns ] > Voila. Here's the final diff with the changes discussed Here's my proofreading, and a few opinions: > authors do not claim that not donating is immoral, > unethical, illegal or something similar; otherwise they must > - go in contrib (or non-free, if even

Processed: Re: Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy

2000-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 64437 [ACCEPTED 2000/06/06] Must/Should/May in policy Bug#64437: [ACCEPTED 2000/06/06] Must/Should/May in policy Changed Bug title. > severity 64437 normal Bug#64437: [ACCEPTED 2000/06/06] Must/Should/May in policy Severity set to `normal'. >

Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy

2000-06-05 Thread Anthony Towns
retitle 64437 [ACCEPTED 2000/06/06] Must/Should/May in policy severity 64437 normal thanks On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 06:36:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Assuming there aren't any more issues, I'll mark this as ACCEPTED next > Sunday or so (ie, two weeks after it was PROPOSED, and however long >

Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:)

2000-06-05 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 10:04:04AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > > My original statement: "we should document the APIs provided by > > virtual packages." > > > > My modified statement in light of all the feedback I've gotten: "we > > should document what

Re: unusable examples in apckages ...

2000-06-05 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 01:17:08PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > Well, in the mlgtk package i maintain, i have the Makefile gunzipping the > > needed file automatically, and make clean gziping them again. (i also have a > > make clean in the example dir during prerm, so dpkg will remove the