Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also there's one little difference between packages needing
> www-browser and mp3-decoder: a lot of packages ship HTML and by
> depending (any sort of dep) on www-browser they signal the user
> he'll need a program to see the text. However, there aren't a
On 14-May-00, 13:56 (CDT), Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But a package which Recommends: www-browser needs no standard
> > interface whatsoever, for example.
>
> I believe they all fit this template:
>
> command-line:
>
But a l
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 11:56:29AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > But a package which Recommends: www-browser needs no standard
> > interface whatsoever, for example.
>
> I believe they all fit this template:
>
> command-line:
Also there's one little difference between packages needing www
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Two things I'd like to see done with the virtual package system:
> > 1. Define APIs for all virtual packages.
> > 2. Tie virtual packages to the alternatives system, somehow.
> > The
4 matches
Mail list logo
