Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:48:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#62943: debian-policy omits packaging manual
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:43:00PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says:
>
>Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash
>package, no other package may put any environment variables or other
>commands into that file.
>
> s/bash/base
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Seconded.
--
Digital Electronic Being
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:39:05PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> When this was written, non-us was a mix of free and non-free software.
> This is no longer true in potato, so I propose to change that to:
>
> -
> [...]
> Thus, the
On 24-Apr-00, 06:43 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says:
>
> [...]
>
>Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash
>package, no other package may put any environment variables or other
>commands into that file.
On Apr 24, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm looking for seconds for this proposal.
Seconded.
--
ciao,
Marco
On 24-Apr-00, 06:39 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When this was written, non-us was a mix of free and non-free software.
> This is no longer true in potato, so I propose to change that to:
>
> -
> [...]
> T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 62943 normal
Bug#62943: debian-policy omits packaging manual
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
>
> I'm looking for seconds for this pro
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
I'm seconding this proposal.
--
Raul
Package: debian-policy
Version: potato
Severity: wishlist
Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says:
[...]
Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash
package, no other package may put any environment variables or other
commands into that file.
s/bash/base-files/
Ma
Package: debian-policy
Version: potato
Severity: wishlist
Policy 2.1.6, "Further copyright considerations" says:
[...]
When in doubt, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be prepared
to provide us with the copyright statement.
Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
Package: debian-policy
Version: potato
Severity: wishlist
"Debian Policy Manual - Chapter 2, The Debian Archive" needs
an update for potato since it says:
The effort of the Debian project is to build a free operating system,
but not every package we want to make accessible is free in our se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 61308 [AMMENDMENT 22/04/2000] About the use of conffiles
Bug#61308: [PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administr
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: important
debian-policy omits packaging manual, changelog indicates
that packaging manual is still present (doesn't indicate
any reason for it to be omitted).
--
Raul
15 matches
Mail list logo
