>So you are saying that packers are omitting an EXISTING manpage, and instead
>putting a link to the undocumented.7 page? You are right, this IS
>a bug, and yes, its the kind that is unlikely to be found for quite a while.
>However, what about the more common case where there IS no manpage? Then
>I am. And emacs is practically the only editor I use. Emacs is HUGE, and
>I totally -agree- with the rights of a person to say "I don't want it,
Also emacs has several variants, and most people who use it regularly have
opinions on which one they want, and probably don't want to waste space on
tw
Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So you are saying that packers are omitting an EXISTING manpage, and instead
> putting a link to the undocumented.7 page?
No, what he's saying is that people *routinely* use undocumented(7)
*without* any bug report on file. (And a smaller but still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
So you are saying that packers are omitting an EXISTING manpage, and instead
putting a link to the undocumented.7 page? You are right, this IS
a bug, and yes, its the kind that is unlikely to be found for quite a while.
However, what about the more common case
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:39:34PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > I'm not going to second this proposal.
> >
> > I think that it misses the real issue in favor of a rhetorical position.
>
> I disagree. The rationale for this proposal was twofold:
>
Hi all,
I spent the entire evening today converting VA to LDAP and cleaning out
alot of cruft. In the process I had to renumber several of CVS repository
group IDs, I hope this doesn't effect anything but if something goes
funny, this might be why.
There was some downtime on www user pages (~jgg
6 matches
Mail list logo
