On 14 Dec 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
> What about all the regulations we put on shared-libs. If they're not in
> one of the key directories, do we care? Policy seems to indicate that
> there is no exemption for these beasties.
IMHO our policy guidelines for packages represent common 'good pra
That's part of why Myth and I are bringing this to the -policy list. I
don't have a
suggestion/preference. I just want to implement in lintian the right thing.
Right now, there
are many requests for overrides/bugs filed to get various checks turned
off.. but as I read policy now.. that's against
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:07:32AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
[Please wrap your lines!]
> What about all the regulations we put on shared-libs. If they're
> not in one of the key directories, do we care? Policy seems to
> indicate that there is no exemption for these beasties.
It's a good point
What about all the regulations we put on shared-libs. If they're not in one of
the key directories, do we care? Policy seems to indicate that there is no
exemption for these beasties.
Richard Braakman wrote:
> packages in main cannot _depend_ on non-main packages. They can
> > however suggest and recommend them.
>
> Incorrect. Policy section 2.1.2 is explicit about this:
>
> In addition, the packages in "main"
> * must not require a package outside of "main" for
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 08:56:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> My biggest objection is that we haven't yet got any kind of proposal for
> subdivision of /usr/share/images. Who wants to come up with one? Hint: it
> would be best if we didn't have to hack every window manager in existence
> to
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 04:22:08PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:56:22PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Packages that use libtool to create shared libraries must
> > include the .la files in the -dev
> > + packages, if it includes them at all. Dyn
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 08:05:20PM -0500, Franklin Belew wrote:
> Section 4.3 of policy says nothing about the location of libraries.
> Section 12 of packaging manual says nothing about the location of libraries
>
> I would like to know what rules there are (if any) about shared libraries
> in loc
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 04:22:08PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:56:22PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Packages that use libtool to create shared libraries must
> > include the .la files in the -dev
> > + packages, if it includes them at all. Dyn
Section 4.3 of policy says nothing about the location of libraries.
Section 12 of packaging manual says nothing about the location of libraries
I would like to know what rules there are (if any) about shared libraries
in locations not mentions in /etc/ld.so.conf or what debian considers
"standard
10 matches
Mail list logo
