On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 01:20:03AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> I'm a lot more sympathetic to this objection than I am to AT's,
> though. Fixing all the dselect methods would certainly be a Good
> Thing. :-)
That is an easy one. Come up with a way to get rid of all the dselect
methods expect for
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 01:08:41AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > And, gee, shock horror, I'll say the exact same thing I said last time
> > you mentioned this, and that is that it's much more alike things that
> > -policy discusses that things the packaging-manual discusse
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 12:32:08AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > The downside is, of course, that dpkg isn't very good at ordering
> > things, but again, that's a flaw in dpkg, and I think we'd be better
> > off trying to address that, not just for e
Anthony Towns writes:
> And, gee, shock horror, I'll say the exact same thing I said last time
> you mentioned this, and that is that it's much more alike things that
> -policy discusses that things the packaging-manual discusses.
Yes, I remember. I thought you were suggesting that we move both
On Sun, 12 Dec 1999, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 12:32:08AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > The downside is, of course, that dpkg isn't very good at ordering
> > things, but again, that's a flaw in dpkg, and I think we'd be better
> > off trying to address that, not just for es
On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 12:32:08AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> But ok, if you don't like that, then I'll go back to what I said the
> first time this came up: this belongs in the packaging manual, not
> policy.
And, gee, shock horror, I'll say the exact same thing I said last time
you mentioned t
6 matches
Mail list logo
