> From: Anthony Towns
> What's wrong with using README.Debian for this purpose, which is already
> in common use?
Probably nothing, except that it isn't used consistently.
Daniel
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 10:17:43PM -0500, Brian Mays wrote:
> Besides, is it so difficult to do "dpkg -L pccts"? If you want a list
> of the binaries, then try "dpkg -L pccs | grep bin".
Yes, people should know about dpkg -L in their quest for package level
documentation.
Not only will it show y
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 10:17:43PM -0500, Brian Mays wrote:
> > My suggestion is now, that "man pccts" should either point to the
> > main binaries manpage or show a page that gives a one-line description
> > of the binaries of the package or one that has just relevant "see
> > also: xxx" entries.
> Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like to
> have the same for packages.
For every package? You must be kidding!!
> I just looked for a parser generator that outputs C++ code and found
> pccts. After installation I tried "man pccts", but that failed.
> /usr/doc/pcct
4 matches
Mail list logo
