Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> policy is, that libraries should have package names lib.
When did we have this policy?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: htt
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 10:44:23PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> At Wed, 20 Oct 1999 23:18:53 -0400,
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 02:49:01AM +0900, Shuichi OONO wrote:
> > > I intent to package qvwm and qvbanner, which is a Windows 95/98/NT
> > > lik
I saw several discussions and proposals about using bzip2 to compress
instead of gzip to reduce the overal size of Debian.
I am strongly for allowing bzip2 compression into debs and strongly
against forcing it. Also I am against the way how compression is done
at the moment, so heres my suggestion
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 08:46:55AM -0700 , David Bristel wrote:
> I apologise if this issue has been brought up before(and I suspect it has),
> but
> I am wondering if anything can be done to help clarify and group packages
> based
> on name. Currently, we have console-apt, gnome-apt, as well as
At Wed, 20 Oct 1999 23:18:53 -0400,
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 02:49:01AM +0900, Shuichi OONO wrote:
> > I intent to package qvwm and qvbanner, which is a Windows 95/98/NT
> > like window manager for X Window System.
>
> Please try to support the "x-wind
On 21 Oct 1999 at 10:51, Peter Makholm wrote about "Re: Bug#47438:...":
> > Adding the words "All Rights Reserved." after the whole "Copyright"
> > statement is important as well.
>
> No, nothing is needed. Not even a "Copyright 1999 J. Random Hacker" is
> needed. The Berne Convention provides fo
Brock Rozen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - lose the (c) since it is not a valid substitute the copyright
> > symbol © (it's common, but not really valid; on the other hand,
> > the word "Copyright" is enough on it's own)
>
> Adding the words "All Rights Reserved." after the who
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 at 22:58, Lars Wirzenius wrote about "Bug#47438:...":
> Copyright 1996-1999 Ian Jackson, Christian Schwarz, X, Y, Z
>
> where X, Y, and Z are additional people who have written enough text
> included in the policy manual that they can claim a copyright for their
> part.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 23902 dpkg-iwj
Bug#23902: debian beta 2.0 dpkg dumps core
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-iwj'.
> reassign 32677 dpkg-iwj
Bug#32677: dpkg NMU 1.4.1.1
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-iwj'.
> close 35450
Bug#35450: dpkg:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 39299 [AMENDED PROPOSAL] Permit use of bz2 for source packages
Bug#39299: [PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(
retitle 39299 [AMENDED PROPOSAL] Permit use of bz2 for source packages
thanks
I hereby amend my proposal as follows:
---
The available space and bandwidth available to our FTP server network,
and the space available on individual CDs, is increasingly unable to
meet the demand for their use. It
(-policy only)
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:43:37AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Oct 20, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The policy weekly summary includes ``I further propose that the use
> > of bzip2 be mandatory for newly uploaded source files''. This has been
> > both seconded and objected to (its
On Oct 20, Joost Kooij wrote:
> > So what should it say? Would an extra line:
> > Copyright (c)1998,1999 Debian Policy List Members
> > be appropriate?
>
> That looks very nice at first glance. On second thought, I wonder if
> "Debian Policy List Members" is an entity that you can legally assign
13 matches
Mail list logo
