Policy update

1999-10-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
I would like to spend some time this week updating policy and do an NMU to reflect the decisions of this group. Is anyone already working on it? Julian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL

Re: Stop archive bloat: 47MB gmt-coast-full_19991001-1.deb

1999-10-19 Thread Alexander Koch
On Mon, 18 October 1999 13:15:36 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > On Oct 18, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Another possibility would be someone adding bzip2 support to dpkg et al, > > and having .orig.tar.bz2's, and data.tar.bz2. (This actually doesn't look > > like it'd be all /that/ difficult, either, j

Re: bitmap and pixmap location

1999-10-19 Thread Edward Betts
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bitmaps: /usr/X11R6/include/bitmaps > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/bitmaps > pixmaps: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps > /usr/share/pixmaps I think either /usr/share/pixmaps or /usr/share/bitmaps would be best. -- I consume, therefore I am

bitmap and pixmap location

1999-10-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
I've just been looking at Contents-i386 to get an idea of where bitmaps and pixmaps are currently stored so that I can set up the new system.fvwm2rc file correctly, and I found a mess. The locations of public (as opposed to application-specific) bitmaps and pixmaps are currently: bitmaps: /usr/X1