Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating?

1999-10-14 Thread Raul Miller
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 07:20:05PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > /usr/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/index.html: > > Copyright ©1996,1997,1998 Ian Jackson and Christian Schwarz. > > Yet the manual has been modified by others since. Should the copyright > be updated? Briefly: yes. -- Ra

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Tomasz Wegrzanowski: > > Think of command line arguments, environment variables .. that's > > all 'user input' > > This (command line arguments, environment variables) is > what i checked in manpages. Never ever trust manpages. Read the source. > But theres nothing about > such thin

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 01:45:29PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > According to Tomasz Wegrzanowski: > > > But the source might contain a buffer overflow exploit, or another > > > exploit. Yes, I wrote the code myself, and there is even a comment > > > in the code about running setuid in a s

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Tomasz Wegrzanowski: > > But the source might contain a buffer overflow exploit, or another > > exploit. Yes, I wrote the code myself, and there is even a comment > > in the code about running setuid in a special group. But in my experience > > _every_ setuid program has at least one h

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
> > I see some possibilities to make a mess with suid shutdown but not > > much more mess than with turning power off by button > > but if you know any exploits of suid shutdown of which I dont know > > please tell me (Ive found nothing in manpages) > > Well it would be a bit weird if root-exploit

Bug#43651: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] mailbox locking

1999-10-14 Thread Thomas Kobienia
I second this proposal. by ... -- Thomas Kobienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://my.dex.de/~tk/ "The war won't be over until the last spammer's head is stuck onto a spear at the city limits." [Paul Vixie, NANOG mailing list, Sept.1997]

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Tomasz Wêgrzanowski wrote: > Hmm... I used BSD as root a week and this was long time ago so my habit > is not from this place > Its just much faster and typoless to write `halt' than `shutdown -h now' > According to manpages halt|reboot calls shutdown if sy

Processed: Bug#43651: mailbox locking

1999-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 43651 Bug#43651: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] mailbox locking Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! > reopen 43651 Bug#43651: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] mailbox locking Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity normal 4

Bug#43651: mailbox locking

1999-10-14 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
close 43651 reopen 43651 severity normal 43651 retitle 43651 [AMENDMENT 13/10/1999] mailbox locking thanks This proposal was seconded by Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Mika Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, no objections were posted, so I think that this is a consensus. I hope, that we can bring

Re: shutdown/reboot (was: proposal of new group)

1999-10-14 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Seth R Arnold: > I think this might be debian-specific -- I do remember on other versions of > unix, and probably even on other linux distributions -- that calling halt or > reboot directly is a Very Bad Thing, unless things are worse on their own. :) Well it's pretty much linux-speci

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Tomasz Wêgrzanowski: > > Note that 'shutdown' was NOT designed to be run setuid - for all > > I know it's full of grave security holes if you do. You then not > > only gave the people in the group 'power' permission to shut down > > the machine, you just granted them root access as wel

Re: [bi]weekly policy summary

1999-10-14 Thread Mika Fischer
On Sat, 09 Oct at 19:27 -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Mailbox locking (#43651) > * Stalled for 2 weeks. > * Proposed by Roland Rosenfeld; seconded by Joey Hess. > * "The Debian policy is not very clear in the definition of the way, > mailbox locking should be implemented. It only points to a

shutdown/reboot (was: proposal of new group)

1999-10-14 Thread Seth R Arnold
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Tomasz Wêgrzanowski wrote: > > Really, you are not supposed to call 'halt' or 'reboot' directly - > > that's just a BSD heritage that people can't seem to get rid of. > > But if you insist on it, halt or reboot don't need to be setuid root, > > since they c

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Raul Miller
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 07:33:53PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote: > What's inelegant about sudo? It creates (and waits for) dns traffic every time it's run. In some circumstances this means sudo just hangs. -- Raul

Re: Proposal of new group

1999-10-14 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Tomasz Wêgrzanowski wrote: [ snip ] : > >This group would be very useful for desktop machines for people who : > >set computer on (via switch), login as common user and do what they have to : > >and then stop the computer via command (`halt' or `shutdown -h now') : > >or