On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:51:30AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Here's a quote from the policy:
> >
> > `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG or
> > which are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their
> > distribution problematic.
>
>
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 06:05:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Here's a quote from the policy:
>
> `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG or
> which are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their
> distribution problematic.
Encumbered by
> No, this is silly. When you install a package, it is for use. If you
> don't intend to use it, why install it?
Perhaps you can explain where this idea comes from.
Of course, if I want to evaluate a daemon, I can --unpack the package
into /usr/local/testfun and manually enable it, evaluate it
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 02:03:46PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> 1. dpkg can't replace a directory with a symlink
s/can't/doesn't/
This is a documented feature (somewhere in packaging manual).
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
4 matches
Mail list logo