Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PS: I know my lines are longer than 76 characters, fix your own pager/viewers
> wordwrap
No, fix your attitude and read RFC1855. Excerpt:
- Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line
with a carriage return.
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 04:44:10PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > a) I would not test a new daemon on a working machine, I would use a
> > separate
>
> So?
>
> > b) if you know what you are doing, compile the packages by hand, fix their
> > install scripts, and remove the conflicts. You are tryi
> a) I would not test a new daemon on a working machine, I would use a separate
So?
> b) if you know what you are doing, compile the packages by hand, fix their
> install scripts, and remove the conflicts. You are trying to circumvent the
> norm.
If I wanted to compile them by hand, why would I
>
> So what you're telling me is that anyone with a "complex" setup
> shouldn't bother using Debian?
>
a) I would not test a new daemon on a working machine, I would use a separate
one. In the case of gnu pop3, it will spin off and consume 99% of your cpu due
to poor child management. We (I am
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 02:03:48PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
>
> > Data section (#38902)
> > * Consensus.
> > * Proposed on 3 Jun 1999 by Darren O. Benham; seconded by Peter S
> > Galbraith and Peter Makholm.
> > * "Since there is interest in packaging census data, maps, genome
> >
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps there are people who want a "service enabled by default" policy,
> > and perhaps we should accomodate them. However, I'm not one of them
> > and I don't want any services turned on on some of my machines without
> > my explicit ok.
On Mon, Sep 27
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 01:10:51AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Perhaps there are people who want a "service enabled by default" policy,
> and perhaps we should accomodate them. However, I'm not one of them
> and I don't want any services turned on on some of my machines without
> my explicit ok.
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> Perhaps there are people who want a "service enabled by default" policy,
> and perhaps we should accomodate them. However, I'm not one of them
> and I don't want any services turned on on some of my machines without
> my explicit ok.
Yes, and I think thi
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Clint Adams wrote:
> They both provide httpd; should I file bugs against them demanding that
> they conflict with it too?
I think this is a good point; it doesn't seem to be a clear area
of policy. It sounds like perhaps some new system needs to be
implemented. Perhaps a Su
9 matches
Mail list logo
