> On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 04:07:42PM -0400, Alexander Pennace wrote:
> > since bo, point releases have been identified like 1.3r2.
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd rather fix the 1.3r2 problem and go back to 1.3.2, it's less confusing
> and only the greenest of users couldn't figur
On 12-Sep-99, 11:01 (CDT), "Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.0.1.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Add to section 3.1.2:
>
> /usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
> does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation o
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 06:01:05PM +0200, Juergen A. Erhard wrote:
> /usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
> does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation of even
> parts of a package.
So, for example, my Hugs package is in violation of this proposed
ame
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.1.1
Severity: normal
Add to section 3.1.2:
/usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation of even
parts of a package.
Thus, no package may depend on the existence of anything
On 11-Sep-99, 19:44 (CDT), Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I don't feel a real strong objection, I don't think this kind of
> > stuff (rationale) belongs in the standard. It's already wordy enough.
>
> Well, it is not without precedence. For a lot of things in the policy, we
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Sep-99, 08:04 (CDT), Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Raul suggested to mention core dumps, which is indeed a good idea.
> > I extended this to give a general rationale for debugging symbols.
6 matches
Mail list logo
