On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Sep-99, 08:04 (CDT), Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Raul suggested to mention core dumps, which is indeed a good idea.
> > I extended this to give a general rationale for debugging symbols.
On 10-Sep-99, 08:04 (CDT), Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Raul suggested to mention core dumps, which is indeed a good idea.
> I extended this to give a general rationale for debugging symbols.
[*snip* of suggested wording]
While I don't feel a real strong objection, I
>Accepted Amendments
>
> Data section (#38902)
> * Consensus.
> * Proposed on 3 Jun 1999 by Darren O. Benham; seconded by Peter S
> Galbraith and Peter Makholm.
> * "Since there is interest in packaging census data, maps, ge
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:56:24AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I don't mind this proposal as long as it satisfies everyone. I'll redo mine
> to match Marcus's suggested one if I don't hear any complaints.
Thanks for your positive response. I hope people speak up if they have
complaints, so they ca
4 matches
Mail list logo
