On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 04:01:03PM -0400, Brad Allen wrote:
> I write to you as someone who wants to tell you what I wish to see in
> a Debian distribution who is seriously considering a switch as a user
> from RedHat (due to a lack of reponsiveness). First off, I am
> concerned that the current
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Anthony Towns wrote:
> [...] formal objections are only appropriate in extreme circumstances.
This is an interesting comment.
I think there are several kinds of policy proposals:
1. Those who add new rules in policy to be followed.
2. Those who modify already existing rules
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Anthony Towns wrote:
> [...]
> Must all packages work completely correctly even in unconfigured state?
This is a very good question, indeed.
I withdraw my suggestion to use Pre-Depends for this.
[ Still, we have to be very sure that *every* MTA is stopped in the postrm
befor
> + There are at least two different, yet functionally equivalent,
> + ways of handling these scripts. For the sake of simplicity,
> + this document describes only the symbolic link method.
> + However, it may not be assumed that this method is being used,
> +
At 15:44 -0600 1999-08-09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Brad Allen wrote:
3. On a minor note, I find the "ip" program written by Alexey Kuznetsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> available at ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/
which replaces the "ifconfig" and "route" commands to be very
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 11:44:08PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Well we arn't getting anywhere at all with a good transition to
> /usr/share/doc, but perhaps this will be easier.
>
> I'm concerned about what happens when packages start using /usr/share/man.
> Suppose I convert alien to put it's man p
6 matches
Mail list logo
