On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 02:14:18PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 03:32:35PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> > > Can you provide any positive arguments in *favor* of undocumented(7)?
>
> > One thing undocumented(7) does is suggest so
[ carbon copy to debian-policy ]
Shane Owenby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the 'force-reload' option doing that the 'restart' option
> doesn't already do? They both _force_ the daemon to reload its
> configuration. 'restart' stops and then restarts the daemon and
> 'force-reload' seems
Hello List !
> > I like to use a coppled Replace: + Conflict: to replace a package with
> > a another one with a different name.
> > This works well - but only with ONE package. The second packet will not
> > be "considered to be removed" by dpkg. Why ?!
>
> Limitation of dpkg.
Argh! What would
> Would it be too radical to suggest that the maintainer who
> does not have the resources to write the man page at least
> file a bug report to remind himself (and perhaps signal volunteer man
> page writers) that the manual page is missing, and that he/she is
> aware of the bug?
Thi
Nicolás>> Er... should I remove it from the manpages package? Should I
Nicolás>> wait? =)
Manoj> Removing it from the manpages package before policy changes
would be
Manoj> at least an important bug.
I know, I know... =)
5 matches
Mail list logo
