Re: Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-22 Thread Chris Waters
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about: > If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility > or function, this is a bug in the package. Until this is > rectified, a symbolic link from the missing manual page to the > undocumented(7) ma

Re: Bug#39830: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-22 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > How about: > > -- > If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility > or function, this is a bug in the package. Until this is > rectified, a

Re: Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, How about: -- If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility or function, this is a bug in the package. Until this is rectified, a symbolic link from the missing manual page to the

Re: System integrity...

1999-06-22 Thread Chris Leishman
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 10:13:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > > I'm not tracking this proposal on the weekly policy summary because as far > as I can see, it has nothing to do with policy per se, it's stricly a debian > mirror thing. > > If people disagree with me on this, I'll be happy to track

Bug#39831: FSSTND refers to an inaccessible file, namely, device-list

1999-06-22 Thread Julian Gilbey
> In the /dev section of the FSSTND > (/usr/doc/debian-policy/fsstnd/fsstnd-1.2.txt.gz) the following text is > found: ``All device special files should follow the standard in that > document, which is available via anonymous ftp at ftp.yggdrasil.com > in /pub/device-list.'' However, I cannot acc

Re: Menu-2.0, optimized menu tree, hints

1999-06-22 Thread joost witteveen
Je 1999/06/21(1)/12:06, Chris Waters montris sian geniecon skribante: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Wow! You've utterly bypassed the whole policy issue with a brilliant idea! > > Well, no (though that was my first reaction too). We still should > have a policy regarding the *defa